Transforming Theoretical Knowledge into Practical Coaching Expertise in University-Level Artistic Gymnastics
Abstract views: 17 / PDF downloads: 6
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70736/2958.8332.kosalb.40Keywords:
Gymnastics Curriculum, Techniques, Practice, Theory, Student’s PerformanceAbstract
Study aim(s): The study aims to assess the transfer ratio of theoretical knowledge to practical application among sports science students during artistic gymnastic lessons.
The study sample included 47 second-grade students (37 girls and 10 boys) from the coaching, exercise, management, recreation, and enabled people’s department within the Faculty of Sport Sciences at Istanbul Gelisim University.
Methods: The analyses of the student's practical scores consist of Practical Routine (PR: 25%), Assistance in Gymnastics (AG: 15%), and Learning Steeps (LS: 15%). The student's theoretical scores were evaluated based on General Performance (GP: 10%), Physical Preparation (PP: 15%), Theoretical preparation (THP: 10%), and Technique evaluation (TE: 10%). To ensure result validity, overall scores from online education were also tested. SPSS 26 programs were used for the data analysis, applying descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and canonical correlation analyses.
Results: The study revealed a significant correlation between students’ overall scores and both theoretical (p<0.05, r=0.497) and practical (p<0.05, r=0.920) knowledge. The correlation coefficient of the GS to the practical and theoretical variables was determined as follows: PR (r=0.686), AG (r=0.799), LS (r=0.799), GP (r=0.720), PP (r=0.685), (r=0.scores), and TE (r=0.511).
Conclusion: It can be concluded that, while practice shows a limited ability to explain theoretical knowledge, theory tends to explain practical knowledge more effectively in the first canonical variable.
References
Jeannerod M. The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 1994;17(2):187-202. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00034026.
Živčić K, Breslauer N, Stibilj-Batinić T. Dijagnosticiranje i znanstveno verificiranje metodičkog postupka učenja u sportskoj gimnastici. Odgojne znanosti, 2008; 1(15), 159-180.
Pan SC, Richard A. Retrieval practice: The need for greater understanding and precision in research and application. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2018; 7(4), 589-598.
Wilson M. Six views of embodied cognition. Psychon Bull Rev. 2002;9 (4):625–36 https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/BF03196322.
Lave J. Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. 1988; Cambridge University Press.
Shadmehr R, Holcomb HH. Neural correlates of motor memory consolidation. Science. 1997 Aug 8;277(5327):821-5. doi:
1126/science.277.5327.821.PMID: 9242612.
Holmes PS, Collins DJ. The PETTLEP approach to motor imagery: A functional equivalence model for sport psychologists. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2001;13(1):60–83.
Keil D, Holmes P, Bennett S, Davids K, Smith N. Theory and practice in sport psychology and motor behavior needs to be constrained by integrative modeling of brain and behavior. J Sports Sci.,2000;Jun;18(6):433-43.doi: 10.1080/02640410050074368.PMID: 10902678.
Bransford JD, Brown AL, Cocking RR. How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. 2000; National Academy Press.
Gentner D, Hoyos C. Analogical transfer in learning and reasoning. Journal of Cognitive Science, 2017; 11(1), 50-74.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001032.
Chaiklin S, Lave J. Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context, 1996; Cambridge University Press.
Brown JS, Collins A, Duguid P. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 1989;18(1), 32-42.
Edelman G. Bright Air, Brilliant Fire: On the Matter of Mind.1992, New York: Penguin.
Deci EL, Ryan RM. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Springer; 1985. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7.
Day SB, Goldstone RL. Analogical reasoning and the transfer of relational information. Thinking & Reasoning, 2011; 17(1), 49-56.
Kutas M, Federmeier KD. Minding the body. Psychophysiology, 1998; 35, 135±150.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 KOSALB International Journal of Human Movements Science
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.