Examination of Gait and Balance Parameters Between Genders


Abstract views: 41 / PDF downloads: 16

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70736/2958.8332.kosalb.45

Keywords:

Gender, Gait, Joint Kinematics, Balance

Abstract

Study aim(s): This study aimed to examine the relationship between dynamic balance and gait parameters, focusing on gender differences. Specifically, it sought to determine the presence of asymmetry between the right and left side in dynamic balance control among healthy individuals, as well as to explore the influence of age, gender, and anthropometric characteristics on dynamic stability. Additionally, the study examined the relationship between dynamic balance and spatial-temporal gait parameters.

Methods: The study population consisted of 66 volunteers (33 female, 33 male participants), all leading sedentary lifestyle. The average age of the female participants was 30.58±6.275 years, while that of the male participants was 30.39±4.899 years. Participants first completed a sociodemographic form. Following this, a static balance test was performed using the D-Wall apparatus in a bipedal stance, both with eyes open and closed. The test was conducted three times, with the mean value recorded. Afterward, participants rested passively for five minutes before the commencement of the gait analysis. In the initial phase of the investigation, a walking analysis was conducted barefoot at a velocity of 4.0 km/h (SCX version) on the Walker View device. During a one-minute trial at this speed, the following variables were recorded for one minute at 4.0 km/h: lower extremity trunk, hip, and knee flexion range of motion; stride lengths, cadence, and contact times. The collected data were then analyzed using an independent t-test.

Results: The mean body mass index (BMI) was 21.77±1.071 kg/m² for women and 24.08±2.246 kg/m² for men. A significant difference was identified in the trunk flexion range of motion (ROM), favoring men, and in eyes-open static bipedal balance, favoring women (p < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in the remaining parameters (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: The results demonstrated significant discrepancies between male and female participants in trunk flexion ROM, where men outperformed women, and in eyes-open static balance, where women outperformed men. These findings indicate that gender is an important factor to consider in dynamic balance and gait assessments.

References

Winter DA, Patla AE, Prince F, Ishac M, Gielo-Perczak, K. Stiffness control of balance in quiet standing. Journal of neurophysiology, 1998; 80(3),1211–1221. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1998.80.3.1211.

Hurmuzlu Y, Basdogan C. On the measurement of dynamic stability of human locomotion. Journal of biomechanical engineering, 1994; 116(1), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2895701.

Visser JE, Carpenter MG, van der Kooij H, Bloem BR. The clinical utility of posturography. Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2008; 119(11), 2424–2436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2008.07.220.

Bruijn SM, van Dieën JH. Control of human gait stability through foot placement. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2018; 15(143), 20170816. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2017.0816.

Perttunen JR, Anttila E, Södergård J, Merikanto, J, Komi PV. Gait asymmetry in patients with limb length discrepancy. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2004; 14(1), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2003.00307.x.

Patterson KK, Nadkarni NK, Black SE, McIlroy WE. Gait symmetry and velocity differ in their relationship to age. Gait & posture,2012; 35(4), 590–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.11.030.

Dingwell JB, Cavanagh PR. Increased variability of continuous overground walking in neuropathic patients is only indirectly related to sensory loss. Gait & posture, 2001; 14(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0966-6362(01)00101-1.

Widmer M, Minghetti A, Romkes J, Keller M, Gysin R, Neuhaus C, Widmer B, Sangeux M, Viehweger E. Group-based progressive functional, high-intensity training in adolescents and young adults with unilateral cerebral palsy - a tool to improve gross motor function, endurance and gait? - a pilot study. Developmental neurorehabilitation, 2024; 27(7), 235–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/17518423.2024.2398151.

Handžić I, Reed KB. Perception of gait patterns that deviate from normal and symmetric biped locomotion. Frontiers in psychology, 2015; 6, 199. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00199.

Smith JD, Martin PE. Walking patterns change rapidly following asymmetrical lower extremity loading. Human movement science, 2007; 26(3), 412–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2006.12.001.

Toda H, Hobara H, Tada M. Sex differences in dynamic joint stiffness during walking in older adults. Gait & posture, 2024; 108, 50–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.11.007.

Van Criekinge T, Hallemans A, Van de Walle P, Sloot LH. Age- and sex-related differences in trunk kinematics during walking in able-bodied adults. GeroScience, 2024; 46(2), 2545–2559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-023-01028-5.

Bravi M, Massaroni C, Santacaterina F, Di Tocco J, Schena E, Sterzi S, Bressi F, Miccinilli S. Validity Analysis of WalkerViewTM Instrumented Treadmill for Measuring Spatiotemporal and Kinematic Gait Parameters. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021; 21(14), 4795. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21144795.

Üzümcü B, Açar G, Konakoğlu G, Mutuş R. Investigation of the Effectiveness of TecnoBody Devices in Rehabilitation. Istanbul Gelisim University Journal of Health Sciences, 2024; (22), 383-394. https://doi.org/10.38079/igusabder.1418692.

Lordall J, Arnold CM, Donkers SJ, Farthing JP, Oates AR, Lanovaz JL. Walking balance control in different settings: Effects of walking speed and biological sex. Gait & posture, 2024; 114, 21–27. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2024.08.082.

Bruening DA, Frimenko RE, Goodyear CD, Bowden DR, Fullenkamp AM. Sex differences in whole body gait kinematics at preferred speeds. Gait & posture, 2015; 41(2), 540–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.12.011.

Cho SH, Park JM, Kwon OY. Gender differences in three dimensional gait analysis data from 98 healthy Korean adults. Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon), 2004;19(2), 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2003.10.003.

Kerrigan DC, Todd MK, Della Croce U. Gender differences in joint biomechanics during walking: normative study in young adults. American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation, 1998; 77(1), 2–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002060-199801000-00002.

Rowe E, Beauchamp MK, Astephen Wilson J. Age and sex differences in normative gait patterns. Gait & posture, 2021; 88, 109–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.05.014

Downloads

Published

2024-12-20

How to Cite

Bıyıklı, T., Açar, G., & Üzümcü, B. (2024). Examination of Gait and Balance Parameters Between Genders. KOSALB International Journal of Human Movements Science, 3(2), 54–60. https://doi.org/10.70736/2958.8332.kosalb.45

Issue

Section

Articles