Biomechanical analysis of clinical angle degrees of the lower and upper back at different stages of the functional threshold power (FTP) test in mountain cyclists


Abstract views: 90 / PDF downloads: 42

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12538936

Keywords:

Back Curve Changes , Natural Angle , Clinical Angle, Cyclist, Fatigue

Abstract

Study aim(s): The aim of the study was a biomechanical analysis of the angular degrees of the hip angle, shoulder angle, clinical hip angle, and clinical shoulder angle at five stages of the FTP test.

Methods: The study includes 8 male mountain cycling athletes aged 14-16 years old. Sample size sufficiency was tested using the G*Power program. Performance measure and evaluation tests; clinical hip angle, clinical shoulder angle, hip angle degree, shoulder angle, and the FTP test-were applied. For the data analysis of the variables, the Kinovea-0.9.4-x64.exe program was used. Repeated Measure ANOVA and Pairwise Comparison Analysis were used.

Results: Differences of the back curves and clinical hip and shoulder angle degrees in different stages of the FTP test were found to be statistically significant between and within groups (p<0.05). However, there were no statistically significant changes in clinical shoulder angle degrees during the different stages of the FTP test or between groups (p>0.05).

Conclusion: During the execution of the FTP test, clinical hip and shoulder angles increased, and it was accompanied by back curve increases. To avoid injury risk, back pain, and delayed fatigue, it is necessary to develop flexibility and mobility of the hips and force of the erector muscles.

References

Mestdagh K, de Vey. Personal Perspectives. Southern Journal of Philosophy. 2007; 45[SUPPL]:28–44. Doi: 10.1111/j.2041-6962.2007.tb00109.x.

Drummond JJ. Personal perspectives. The Southern Journal of Philosophy. 2007 Mar;45(S1):28-44.

Blocken B, Toparlar Y. Andrianne T. “CFD Analysis of an Exceptional Cyclist Sprint Position.” Sports Engineering. 2019; 22[1] pp. 1–11. DOI: 10.1007/s12283-019-0304-7.

Lebec, Michael T, Marin L, Campbell. “Etiology and Intervention for Common Overuse Syndromes Associated with Mountain Biking.” Ann Sports Med Res, 2015; 2[3]:1022.

Bini RR, Di Alencar TA. Non-Traumatic Injuries in Cycling [Biomechanics of Cycling]. 2000. Editor: Rodrigo R. Bini and Felipe P. Carpes. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-05539-8

Peveler WW, James MG. Effects of Saddle Height on Economy and Anaerobic Power in Well-Trained Cyclists. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2011; 25[3]:629–33.doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d09e60.

Nieves DB, Barrios C, Vera P, Laíz C. Incidence and Risk for Traumatic and Overuse Injuries in Top-Level Road Cyclists. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2012; 30[10]:1047–53. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2012.687112.

Clarsen B, Bahr R, Heymans MW, Engedahl M. The Prevalence and Impact of Overuse Injuries in Five Norwegian Sports: Application of a New Surveillance Method. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports. 2015;25[3]:323–30.DOI: 10.1111/sms.12223

Mackey J, Horner K. What is known about the FTP20 test related to cycling? A scoping review. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2021.1955515

Jeroen S, Holliday W. “Cycling Biomechanics Optimization - The [R] Evolution of Bicycle Fitting.” Current Sports Medicine Reports. 2019; 18[12]:490–96. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0000000000000665.

Hoof V, Volkaerts WK, Sullivan OB, Verschueren MS. “Low Back Pain in Cycling: Does It Matter How You Sit?” British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2014; 48[7]:609.2-609. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-093494.134.

McGrath E, Mahony N, Fleming N, Donne B. Is the FTP Test a Reliable, Reproducible and Functional Assessment Tool in Highly-Trained Athletes? International journal of exercise science. 2019; 12(4), 1334–1345.

Hunter A, Andrew R, McGregor S. Training and Racing with a Power Meter, 2019; 3rd edition.

Les A, Cangley P. Determinants of ‘Optimal’ Cadence during Cycling. European Journal of Sport Science, 2009; 9[2]:61–85.doi: 10.1080/17461390802684325.

Wilson IJ. Wattbike. Available at: https://wattbike.com/ (accessed 15.09.2021).

Diví P, Padullés-Riu A, Busquets-Faciaben JM, Padullés, Chando A. Validity and reliability of the kinovea program in obtaining angular and distance dimensions. Preprints. 2017;2017100042. doi:10.20944/preprints201710.0042.v1.

Kinovea-0.9.4-x64.exe. [Internet]. 2021. [updated 2021 Apr 15; cited 2021 Feb 5]. Available at: https://www.kinovea.org (accessed 15.09.2021)

Sovndal S. Cycling Anatomy. Human Kinetics, 2009; 77 p.

Jonathan DB, Jason E, Joubert Diefenthaeler F, Trinity J. “Changes in Muscle Activity and Kinematics of Highly Trained Cyclists during Fatigue.” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2008;55[11]:2666–74.doi: 10.1109/TBME.2008.2001130.

Süzen LB. Hareket Sistemi Anatomisi ve Kinesiyoloji [Movement System Anatomy and Kinesiology], Turkey, Nobel publishing company, 2013; 90 p.

Majid A, Nourian R, Khodaee M. Mountain Biking Injuries. Current Sports Medicine Reports, 2017; 16[6]:404–12. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0000000000000429

Downloads

Published

2024-06-30

How to Cite

Büyükergün, A., & Güler Yilmaz, M. (2024). Biomechanical analysis of clinical angle degrees of the lower and upper back at different stages of the functional threshold power (FTP) test in mountain cyclists. KOSALB International Journal of Human Movements Science, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12538936

Issue

Section

Articles